Legal Opinion

Capitol Electric Co. v. Campbell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1950No. 7194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff (appellant) brought this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for electrical equipment furnished and work done on property owned by defendant (respondent). From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff furnished the electrical equipment and did the work at the instance and request of David J. Campbell, defendant’s husband, and sought to hold the defendant responsible and to have and foreclose a lien on her property on the theory that David J. Campbell was the agent of his wife.

The trial court found that plaintiff sold the material and did the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrison, Merrill & Co. v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Caldwell v. OverallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellsworth v. American Arbitration Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. MacRis v. Sculptured Software, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Capitol Electric Co. v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API