Legal Opinion

Cordilla v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 1937No. 27399PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

The plaintiffs, Mary Taylor and Willie Taylor, claiming to be the sole and only heirs at law of their father, Washington Taylor, deceased, a full-blood Seminole allottee, filed this action to quiet title to the allotment of their father. They made 'as party defendant, Effie Cordilla, nee Miles, a full-blood Tonkawa Indian, who filed an answer alleging that she was the wife of Washington Taylor at the time of his death and was entitled to an interest in the land herein involved. The plaintiffs filed a reply denying the affirmative allegations of defendant’s answer and pleading the statute of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mudd v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. In Re Love's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Moorman v. PettitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. City of Muskogee v. BurfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Hivick v. TurbenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harrison v. EavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. West v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. In Re Trope's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Turlington v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Quinton v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API