Legal Opinion

Swetnam v. Hale

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1929No. 19291PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HERR, O.

This is an action originally brought in the district court of Mayes county by Thomas Hale against Beatrice Swetnam to recover the sum of $272.13 for material furnished to repair a building located on the north half (N.%) of the northeast quarter (N. E.%) of section 32-22-18, Mayes county, and to foreclose a material-man’s lien.

The trial was to the court, resulting in a judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

Numerous errors are assigned by appellant, but the view taken renders it necessary to pass only upon the fourth assign- meat, that is, that the court erred in overruling…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Huntley v. HoltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  2. Lauer v. BandowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Rust-Owen Lumber Co. v. HoltNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Hoffman v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  5. Aldridge v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Caldwell v. OverallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API