Legal Opinion
Rosenmiller v. Bordes
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided October 28, 1991No. Civ. A. 10738PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTNETT, Vice Chancellor.
Plaintiffs, one of whom is the owner of 50% of the voting stock of defendant Greater Media, Inc., moved for summary judgment on their petition (Complaint) for the appointment of a custodian for the corporation pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 226. The petition seeks to resolve a stockholder deadlock in the election of directors.
Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ deadlock claim and moved for summary judgment on their crossclaim for specific performance of a stockholder voting agreement.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on their crossclaim must be denied because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gilbert v. El Paso Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- McDermott Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. ModellOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Edward F. BAGDON, Plaintiff-Appellee—Cross-Appellant, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., Defendant-Appellant—Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Vantagepoint Venture Partners 1996 v. Examen, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Youkelsone v. Washington Mutual, Inc. (In Re Washington Mutual, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Oglesby v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
- Citigroup Inc. v. AHW Investment Partnership, MFS, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Newell Co. v. PetersenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.