Legal Opinion

Citigroup Inc. v. AHW Investment Partnership, MFS, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 24, 2016No. 641, 2015PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRINE, Chief Justice:

I

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has certified to this Court the following question of law arising from an appeal from a decision issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York:

Are the claims of a plaintiff against a corporate defendant alleging damages based on the plaintiffs continuing to hold the corporation’s stock in reliance on the defendant’s misstatements as the stock diminished in value properly brought as direct or derivative claims? 1

The answer to that question, as explained below, is that the holder claims in this…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. WildensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brightstar Asia, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  2. Perry Capital LLC v. MnuchinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. El Paso Pipeline GP Company, LLC v. BrinckerhoffSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  4. Jeffrey Norman v. David ElkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  5. In re Massey Energy Co. Derivative and Class Action LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API