Legal Opinion

Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. Modell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. 84-130PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWise, J.

Gries argue that Ohio law should apply since the 1965 agreement and 1971 amendment were negotiated in Ohio, executed in Ohio, between Ohio parties, to be performed in Ohio, and an Ohio court is being requested to enforce the agreement. Gries maintain that the general rule is that the law of the place of performance controls the agreement and that Ohio, not Delaware, bears the most significant relationship to this agreement.

Modell argues that Delaware law applies. Were Delaware law to apply the agreement between Gries and Modell would have terminated, at the latest, in 1981 (ten years from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schulke Radio Productions, Ltd. v. Midwestern Broadcasting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Ohayon v. Safeco InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Peter J. McNulty Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. Akro-Plastics v. Drake IndustriesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Jamhour v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
  5. Commerzbank AG v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API