Legal Opinion
Newell Co. v. Petersen
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 30, 2001No. 2-99-1232PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley
Defendants, Allen D. Petersen, William E Wright, Robert W Brady, Charles D. Feebler, Jr., American Tool Companies, Inc., and Petersen Manufacturing Company, Inc., appeal from an order of the circuit court denying their motion to dismiss the second amended complaint of plaintiff, Newell Company. On this interlocutory appeal, the supreme court has directed us to answer two certified questions.
The first certified question is as follows:
“Whether the Illinois borrowing statute for limitations periods, 735 ILCS 5/13 — 210 [(West 1994)], is inapplicable where none of the parties to a cause of action…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Fredman Bros. Furniture Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- First of America Trust Co. v. ArmsteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ennenga v. StarnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Carl E. Thomas v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- CDX Liquidating Trust v. Venrock AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Amakua Development LLC v. WarnerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.