Legal Opinion

In re Keim

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 20, 1956No. 6155PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorley, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary *785Examiner of claims 37 to 42, inclusive, of appellants’ application for a patent ón a process for sizing paper.

The claims have been treated as a unit throughout the consideration of the case in the Patent Office, and in the briefs before us, and it is evident that they must all stand or fall together. Consideration will therefore be confined .to claim 37, which is illustrative. The claim reads:

37. A process for sizing paper comprising forming a web of cellulosie…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re ByckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. In Re ChristmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  3. In Re MannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. In re FreemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  5. In re HowardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of Francis J. BoylanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. Application of John W. Hession, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Application of Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  4. Frank L. Pierce and Amp, Incorporated v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  5. Application of John W. Hession, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API