Application of Howard G. Rogers
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 and 5 in appellant’s application 1 as “unpat-entable over the claims of Haas 2 in view of Sawdey, Van Allan et al. or Tulagin et al.”
The invention relates to an improvement in a process of forming a dye image in an image-receiving layer by diffusion transfer techniques. 3 According to the specification, the color fastness of such dye images upon exposure to sunlight “left something to be desired.” To solve that problem appellant found that:
* * * prior to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Application of Max O. RobesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Albert Bowers and James C. OrrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Charles Curtis SimmonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Immunex Corporation v. Sandoz Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Application of Elroy M. Gladrow and Paul Thomas ParkerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of David J. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Myron J. Jursich and Gail T. RandichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.