Legal Opinion

Ebel v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1974No. Civ. 2212PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GARGANO, J.

This litigation presents a single issue; does the plaintiff in a personal injury action for damages, who had been ordered to submit to a medical examination by a doctor selected by defense counsel, have the unconditional right to tape record all conversations which take place at the doctor’s office during the examination?

The facts are undisputed. On July 6,1970, petitioners instituted an action in the Superior Court of Kern County (Kern County action No. 110503) against real parties for damages resulting from injuries sustained in an automobile accident; petitioners were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caryl Richards, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Sharff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Gonzi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Fred Howland Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edmiston v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hayes v. District Court Ex Rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Ramirez v. MacAdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Edmiston v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Edmiston v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API