Legal Opinion
Fred Howland Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 2, 1966No. Civ. 30651PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.
This proceeding arises out of an action to recover damages in the amount of $200,000 for personal injuries. Petitioner here was one of the defendants named in the damage action. On March 25, 1966, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to strike said defendant’s answer and thereafter entered its default for failure to answer interrogatories, and in addition, ordered that it pay $250 to plaintiff’s attorney as a fee. On May 5 the court refused to reconsider its prior order. On May 27 this proceeding was commenced for a review of those orders.
Inasmuch as the question presented here involves the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Fong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Caryl Richards, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Lund v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- MacDonald v. JoslynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Petersen v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Kahn v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Philpot v. BouchelleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.