Legal Opinion · Dissent

Edmiston v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1978No. L.A. 30845Published

1DissentTobriner, J.

I dissent.

The majority opinion confuses two distinct statutory provisions: (1) the discretionary power of the trial court, under Code of Civil Procedure section 2032, subdivision (a) to impose protective conditions on the taking of a medical examination; and (2) the right of the parties under subdivision (b) to a written report of the examining physician’s medical findings and conclusions. In consequence of this confusion, the majority arrive at the illogical holding that videotaping of the examination, a protective condition imposed pursuant to the court’s discretion under *705subdivision (a),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sharff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Edwards v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gonzi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API