Legal Opinion

Coffield v. Peele

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1957No. 27PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This appeal presents for decision the construction of Item 2 of the Will of Edward Peele.

Every will, in a sense, is unique. The same words, or those nearly similar, used under different circumstances and contexts may express different intentions, and for that reason decisions in previous cases are rarely helpful, except as they state the application of certain rules of construction, or certain broad canons of interpretation, which have become so thoroughly established by judicial pronouncement that they may be said to have passed into the definite law upon the subject. Every will is so much a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Holland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Roane v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. DodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Brinkley v. DayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Finke v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Security National Bank of Greensboro v. HannahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API