Jolley v. . Humphries
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Does the limitation, “To have and to hold the afore described real estate during the term of her natural life and at her death to go to Nellie G. Settlemyer,” which follows the description of the third devise in item two of the will of S. R. Humphries, also apply to the first and second devises? Our answer is, that it does not. This is the interpretation which the parties themselves placed upon the will for more than twenty years.
In the first place, the ordinary signification of the words “afore described real estate” is the next preceding, which in the instant case would mean the third tract…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McIver v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Dunn v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- McCallum v. . McCallumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Francks v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Hauser v. Craft.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Barco v. . OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Ferguson v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.