Austin v. . Austin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by plaintiff from 0. S. Allen, J., at March Term, 1912, of Stanly. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Ciarle.
1Opinion of the CourtClare, C. J.
The testator, R. H. Austin, owned two adjoining tracts of land aggregating about 150 acres, which two tracts he cultivated together as one tract. One tract of land, of 53% acres, which he called the “home place,” he acquired in 1856. And the other, of 96 acres, which adjoined and which he called “the Thomas Whitley place,” he purchased in 1881.' He devised all-his property, real and personal, to his wife, as long as she lived; and then he provided: “After me and my wife is gone, I want my son J. E. Austin to have the north side of the dividing line of the home tract of land, and my ison W. R.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peebles v. Graham.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Blue v. . RitterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Woods v. . WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1856
- Doe on Demise of Stowe v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
- Bradshaw v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
3Cited by16 opinions
- Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Coddington v. . StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Gordon v. . EhringhausSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- McCallum v. . McCallumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Ferguson v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.