Legal Opinion

Knight v. Flat Top Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1957No. 8439PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

Plaintiffs and appellants herein brought this action to quiet title to certain un-patented mining claims located in Emery County, Utah, known as the Battle Mountain and Battle Mountain Nos. 1 to 4. The defendants, cross-plaintiffs and joint appellants herein were the locators of claims known as the Beehive and Beehive Nos. 2 and 3 which embraced the same areas as appellants’ claims. The Flat Top Mining Co., one of defendants and respondents herein, claims the Battle Mountain claims Nos. 1 to 4 by virtue of conveyances to it of Flat Top claims Nos. 1 to 4 by its locators and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ickes v. Virginia-Colorado Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Stevens v. Grand Central Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Murray Hill Mining & Milling Co. v. HavenorUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Cadle v. HelfrichArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Morgan v. SorensonUtah Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Disconnection of Part of the Territory of the Town of West Jordan, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Oil Shale Corporation v. UdallDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966
  3. Nielson v. DroubayUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Farley v. FarleyUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Silliman v. PowellUtah Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API