Legal Opinion
Oil Shale Corporation v. Udall
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 21, 1966No. Civ. A. 8680, 8685, 8691, 9202PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.
The four above-named actions arise under the Constitution and laws of the United States. Plaintiffs in all four actions seek an adjudication that certain decisions of the Department of the Interi- or, hereinafter the Department, regarding oil shale placer mining claims in Colorado are erroneous, invalid and without force and effect. Plaintiffs in Civil Action Nos. 8685, 8691 and 9202 seek mandatory orders to compel the Department to issue patents on several placer claims pursuant to certain applications filed by plaintiffs.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KrushnicSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Ickes v. Virginia-Colorado Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hickel v. Oil Shale Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tosco Corp. v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- Oil Shale Corporation v. MortonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1973
- United States v. Eaton Shale Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1977
- Marathon Oil Co. v. LujanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.