Legal Opinion
Barraza v. C. R. Bard Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 11, 2017No. CV16-01374-PHX-DGCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
David G. Campbell, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Maria E. Barraza and others bring this case against Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc. (collectively, “Bard”) seeking medical monitoring. Plaintiffs sue on behalf of themselves and classes of individuals who have been implanted with a Bard inferior vena cava filter, have not had that filter removed, and have not filed a claim or lawsuit for personal injury related to the filter. Doc. 57-2 at 36-41, ¶ 206. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for class certification. Doc. 54. The motion is fully briefed, and the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- August Image LLC v. Esthetic Finesse LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Boykin v. Home Choice of Alabama, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Christian Care Management IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- McBroom v. Ethicon IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Naiman v. Alle Processing CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020