Legal Opinion
August Image LLC v. Esthetic Finesse LLC
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 11, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02457Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 August Image LLC, No. CV-24-02457-PHX-SHD 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Esthetic Finesse LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff August Image LLC’s (“August”) motion for 16 leave to amend its complaint to join Defendant Diane Howard’s husband in this action to 17 “bind the marital community.” (Doc. 53.) Defendants Howard and Esthetic Finesse, LLC 18 (“Esthetic” and collectively, “Defendants”) oppose the motion. (Doc. 54.) For the reasons 19 explained below, August’s motion for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Sonoma County Ass'n of Retired Employees v. Sonoma CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Frank Howey v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Radio Corporation of America, Third-Party v. Universal Services, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. William R. Ponsoldt, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.