Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Kaiser Found. Hosps., Inc.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 8, 2019No. A150833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFujisaki, J.

*651*169Section 473, subdivision (b) (hereafter section 473(b) ), of the Code of Civil Procedure1 contains a provision authorizing mandatory relief from a "default judgment or dismissal" that is entered against a party due to the fault of the party's attorney. When a party moving for such relief submits the required attorney affidavit of fault and otherwise complies with all statutory requirements, the default judgment or dismissal "shall" be vacated "unless the court finds that the default or dismissal was not in fact caused by the attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect." (Ibid…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Even Zohar Construction & Remodeling, Inc. v. Bellaire Townhouses, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Pazderka v. Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ashton v. Clarke CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Hernandez v. FCA US LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Mireskandari v. Marks & Sokolov CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Tawansy v. RIF Investments-3, LLC CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Wong v. Mah CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API