Legal Opinion

Hiller v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1961No. Civ. 25522PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment declaring invalid a contract between the City of Los Angeles and a nonprofit corporation called “Friends of the Los Angeles Zoo.” Also declared invalid was an ordinance authorizing and approving the contract. The ground of decision was that the city has no power to enter into such an agreement.

Plaintiffs brought this action in their capacity as taxpayers of the City of Los Angeles. By the terms of the contract which they seek to have declared invalid, an agreement entitled “Lease of Concession 1 between the City of Los Angeles and the Friends of the Los…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Kennedy v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Egan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Irwin v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. City of Tucson v. RineerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. Save Our Heritage Organisation v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Simons v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API