Legal Opinion

United States v. O'Quin

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 8, 1983No. ACM S25925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Questions concerning former jeopardy and special findings are brought before this Court by the accused, Senior Airman O’Quin. We find no error and affirm.

I

Charges were preferred against the accused by Colonel Boyer, his squadron com*651mander.1 The case was then referred to trial by the special court-martial convenor, Colonel Sachse. Two weeks after his referral, Colonel Sachse departed the installation on temporary duty. Colonel Boyer succeeded to command; as such, Boyer became the special court-martial convenor. In that role, he issued an amendment to the original…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. GordonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. United States v. HusseyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  3. United States v. GerardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. KressinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. EricsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. PostleU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API