Legal Opinion

United States v. Postle

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided April 8, 1985No. Misc. Dkt. No. 85-01PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARR, Judge:

This Government appeal, filed pursuant to Article 62(a)(1), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862(a)(1), and Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 908(b), comes to us for review of an interlocutory ruling of the military judge which excluded evidence that is substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding below. The threshold requirements of the codal and R.C.M. provisions having been apparently met, we turn to a consideration of the specified issue:

WHERE THE UNDERLYING FACTS, ON WHICH A MILITARY SEARCH AUTHORIZATION WAS BASED, WERE PROVIDED BY A KNOWN…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. ParrilloU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. RuhlingU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988
  5. United States v. Flores-GalarzaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API