United States v. Postle
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
BARR, Judge:
This Government appeal, filed pursuant to Article 62(a)(1), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862(a)(1), and Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 908(b), comes to us for review of an interlocutory ruling of the military judge which excluded evidence that is substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding below. The threshold requirements of the codal and R.C.M. provisions having been apparently met, we turn to a consideration of the specified issue:
WHERE THE UNDERLYING FACTS, ON WHICH A MILITARY SEARCH AUTHORIZATION WAS BASED, WERE PROVIDED BY A KNOWN…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. LopezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. ParrilloU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. RuhlingU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. Flores-GalarzaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.