United States v. Ericson
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ABERNATHY, Judge:
Appellant has assigned the following error for our consideration:
THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN FAILING TO MAKE MEANINGFUL SPECIAL FINDINGS UPON DEFENSE REQUEST.
On 5 and 12 November 1980, during the course of his trial, appellant requested special findings on (1) a motion challenging whether compliance was had with Article 25, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 825, in the assignment of members to the court-martial and (2) a motion to dismiss for denial of speedy trial. The military judge agreed to submit such findings and, on 3 February 1981, did so in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. GerardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. KressinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. PostleU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. O'QuinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983