Legal Opinion

United States v. Markette Tillman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 30, 2014No. 13-1013113-10131PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

This case highlights the tension between judicial efforts to control costs of appointed counsel, the defendant’s constitutional right to have counsel appointed, counsel’s reliance on timely payment of Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”) vouchers, and the delays often present in processing vouchers for payment. In this unusual interlocutory appeal, John R. Grele and his former client, Markette Tillman, appeal an order removing Grele as counsel, sanctioning him, and referring him to the California State bar for disciplinary proceedings. Under Flanagan v. United States,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. v. Usdc-CasfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Fred Bowerman v. Field Asset Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. United States v. Douglas DecincesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Schuman v. Microchip Technology IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  5. Fred Bowerman v. Field Asset Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API