Legal Opinion
Schuman v. Microchip Technology Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 5, 2025No. 24-2624PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PETER SCHUMAN; WILLIAM No. 24-2624, COPLIN, 24-2978 D.C. No. Plaintiffs – Appellants / 4:16-cv-05544- Cross-Appellees, HSG v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY OPINION INCORPORATED; ATMEL CORPORATION; ATMEL CORPORATION UNITED STATES SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM, Defendants – Appellees / Cross-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding 2 SCHUMAN V. MICROCHIP TECH. INC. Argued and Submitted May 12, 2025 San Francisco, California…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. William R. Ponsoldt, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Tempo Shain Corporation Neptune Plus Corporation v. Bertek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peter Schuman, et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Peter Schuman, et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026