Legal Opinion
United States v. Douglas Decinces
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 22, 2015No. 15-50033, 15-50058PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Concurrence by Judge WATFORD.
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
This case presents two appeals, one from the government and one from Defendant-Appellant James Mazzo (Mazzo). In Appeal No. 15-50033, the government appeals the district court’s pretrial order granting motions in limine to exclude certain pieces of evidence in a case in which Douglas DeCinces (DeCinces), Mazzo, and others were charged with insider-trading offenses relating to the stock of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.
Appeal No. 15-50058 is Mazzo’s cross-appeal challenging the district court’s order…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cunningham v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hoffman v. Construction Protective Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SchalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- J. A. Herzog v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Cesar UbaldoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Joseph LoftisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Ibraheem MusaibliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Lorenzo Dominguez v. Better Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.