Salinas v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HINOJOSA, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of murdering Raul Lopez, Jr., and assessed his punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at life in prison. We affirm.
In his first two points of error, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. Albert Cruz was the State’s key witness. According to Cruz, he, Lopez, appellant, and another man had been at a bar and then went to Lopez’ house. There, the men ate and arm-wrestled. At some point, appellant became argumentative, and Lopez told him to leave. As appellant was leaving, he said that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Villalon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Ex Parte CruzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Ex Parte WalkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jaile v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
- Hudson v. WhitesideMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- John Crittenden v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993