Legal Opinion

Salinas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1991No. 13-90-255-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of murdering Raul Lopez, Jr., and assessed his punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at life in prison. We affirm.

In his first two points of error, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. Albert Cruz was the State’s key witness. According to Cruz, he, Lopez, appellant, and another man had been at a bar and then went to Lopez’ house. There, the men ate and arm-wrestled. At some point, appellant became argumentative, and Lopez told him to leave. As appellant was leaving, he said that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Villalon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Ex Parte CruzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Ex Parte WalkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jaile v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
  2. Hudson v. WhitesideMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. John Crittenden v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API