Legal Opinion

Clackum v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 6, 1963No. 246-56PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDureee, Judge

On January 20,1960, the court held that a purported discharge given to plaintiff by the United States Air Force was invalid and did not effect plaintiff’s separation from the service. Fannie Mae Clackum v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 404. We directed that her amount of recovery for lost military pay be determined pursuant to Bule 38(c). The parties have entered into a stipulation covering, the amounts plaintiff should receive, based upon varying lengths *36of service. We must now determine the proper period of time for which plaintiff is to be compensated; what payments are to be included…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fannie Mae Clackum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  2. Egan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Murray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Edward Larry Dodson v. United States Government, Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Yee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  4. O'Callahan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  5. Bray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API