Legal Opinion

Murray v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 7, 1961No. 237-57PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurfee, Judge

On May 2, 1954, the Secretary of the Air Force directed that the plaintiff, then a master sergeant, be administratively discharged with a general discharge under honorable con*187ditions under the provisions of Air Force Eegulation 35-66 dated May 31,1954, which pertained to homosexual conduct or tendencies. He was accordingly discharged on May 9, 1956. In this action he questions the validity of his discharge and seeks to recover damages in the form of various items of pay and allowances.

Before commencing this action, plaintiff sought without success to have his discharge changed to an honorable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harmon v. BruckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Fannie Mae Clackum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  4. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. O'Callahan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  3. Richard L. Schlegel v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. Kirk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Birt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API