Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 6, 1961No. 28-60PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuheee, Judge

The plaintiff, a chief petty officer in the Navy with over 20 years service, sues for back pay from December 1,1954, when he was given a general discharge under honorable conditions, by reason of unsuitability.

Plaintiff asserts that his general discharge was not legal because it was issued in violation of the regulations of the Navy which prescribe the administrative procedure for discharge of enlisted personnel for unsuitability.

Article C-10310 of the Bureau of Personnel Manual of 1948, provides as follows:(1) The Bureau may authorize or direct the discharge of enlisted personnel for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Fannie Mae Clackum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  3. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Cason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. O'Callahan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  4. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  5. Harold R. Conn v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API