Legal Opinion

Henkel v. J. J. Henkel Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 13277PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action to recover damages for breach of contract of employment.

The defendant is a California corporation. From July 1, 1919, and during the times herein, involved, it conducted a retail ladies’ ready-to-wear business in San Francisco. Of the 1,000 shares of its authorized capital stock, 375 shares were issued to Benjamin I. Brahms, trustee for Saul Singer; 365 shares to the plaintiff; 10 shares to the plaintiff’s wife, Grace Henkel, and 50 shares to Peter Feinburg. The directors of the company at all the times involved herein…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Ellison-Harvey Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  2. Chamberlain v. Detroit Stove WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stewart Dry Goods Co. v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKeon v. GiustoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Williams v. Schalk Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Lerner v. AmmermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. McLaughlin v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API