Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Hall

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1936No. Civ. 11012Published

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the alleged breach of an agreement under which, as he claims, he was employed as headmaster of a private school operated by defendants, from which employment he was discharged. The ease was submitted upon the sufficiency of plaintiff’s proof to establish a contract of employment; judgment went for the defendants, from which plaintiff appeals.

The original complaint alleged that by contract partly in writing and partly oral, plaintiff was employed for a period of two years at a salary of $1800 per year, payable at the rate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Schalk Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Henkel v. J. J. Henkel Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Gabriel v. Bank of SuisunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API