Legal Opinion
Cardoso v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 29, 1986No. A030395PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Antonio and Dorothy Cardoso appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the demurrer to their amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Appellants’ action is for personal injury caused by a malfunctioning inflatable penile implant manufactured by respondent American Medical Systems, Inc., a Minnesota corporation. The trial court ruled that appellants’ action was barred by the one-year statute of limitations set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 340, subdivision 3, 1 and that the statute was not tolled by the provisions of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rubino v. Utah Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Dew v. AppleberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Epstein v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Loope v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Rios v. Torvald KlavenessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Lewis I. Abramson World Coin Partners v. Joel F. BrownsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Mounts v. UyedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Rivas v. Safety-Kleen CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Argonaut Insurance v. Halvanon InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.