Legal Opinion

Rivas v. Safety-Kleen Corporation

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 2002No. B133572PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CURRY, J.

The claims of appellants Hector Rivas, his wife, Macrina, and Hector Montiel against the manufacturers and suppliers of various allegedly toxic chemicals and compounds were dismissed on statute of limitations grounds. The trial court ruled that appellants had sufficient knowledge of injury and wrongdoing for purposes of accrual of the statute of limitations more than one year prior to the dates their complaints were filed, and that all their claims, including a claim for fraudulent concealment based on failure to warn of a product defect, were subject to the one-year statute…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. 3550 Stevens Creek Associates, a Limited Partnership v. Barclays Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Abb Industrial Systems, Inc. v. Prime Technology, Inc., General Resistance, Inc., Zero-Max, Inc., Barry Wright Corporation, Pacific Scientific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Jones v. ConocoPhillips Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. McCoy v. GustafsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Greco v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Trujillo v. City of OntarioDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API