Argonaut Insurance v. Halvanon Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Czarina1 appeals the district court’s dismissal of its suit against ADA VIS2 (“Territorial”) on the basis that the statute of limitations had expired. According to the district court, the statute of limitations on Czarina’s claims was not tolled by Section 351 of the California Code of Civil Procedure because Territorial could have been served through the Secretary of State in accordance with Section 2111 of the California Corporations Code. Czarina alleges the district court’s interpretation of California’s tolling statute was erroneous. For the following reasons, we agree, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lewis I. Abramson World Coin Partners v. Joel F. BrownsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Loope v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Herring v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.