Legal Opinion

In re Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 23, 2015No. 3:14-md-2516 (SRU)PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.

This case aggregates numerous antitrust actions brought by numerous plaintiffs in various districts against several interrelated pharmaceutical companies, all transferred to this Court by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Under a Practice and Procedure Order (doc. # 37), the actions are consolidated into two groups: all direct-purchaser actions, and all indirect-purchaser actions (the indirect purchasers also style themselves “end pay-ors”). Two consolidated, putative class-action complaints have accordingly…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. In Re Lipitor Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  4. American Sales Co. v. Warner Chilcott Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API