Legal Opinion
Universal Restoration, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 19, 1989No. 77-84-CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
Universal Restoration, Inc., successful on the merits, has applied under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Supp. IV 1986), for attorney fees and other expenses incurred in its contract action against the United States. For reasons discussed below, it is concluded that Universal is not entitled to an EAJA award for its efforts in this case.
I
The suit for which Universal now seeks an EAJA award emerged from its contract with defendant for the repair and restoration of areas within the National War College at Fort McNair in Washington,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Federal Election Commission v. Congressman Charles G. RoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Gavette v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- West Bay Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Orion International Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Raytheon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United States 09-844c &United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.