Legal Opinion

Holy Name School of the Congregation of the Holy Name of Jesus of Kimberly v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 19, 1982No. 81-2245PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, J.

Holy Name School appeals from a judgment affirming a decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission that Mary Retlick is qualified to receive unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to the Unemployment Compensation Act, ch. 108, Stats. Holy Name contends that Retlick is not entitled to these benefits because she voluntarily terminated her employment with the school under sec. 108.04(7) (a), Stats.1 Alternatively, Holy Name asserts that Retlick is disqualified from receiving such benefits because she engaged in “misconduct” within the meaning of sec. 108.04(5), Stats.2 Because we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Robertson Transportation Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Milwaukee Transformer Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Cheese v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Green v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Blue v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. Bernhardt v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. Cornwell Personnel Associates, Ltd. v. Labor & Idustry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Palombi v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API