Cheese v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
There is little or no conflict in the testimony, and the evidence supported the findings made by the appeal tribunal, as well as those findings made by the commission which were consistent with those made by the appeal tribunal. The main points of difference between the two sets of findings are:(1) Claimant sought to justify his putting water in the fuel can in the morning on the grounds that the crane operator, whose directions he had been told to follow, insisted on it, and that the operator promised he would empty the water when no longer required. The appeal tribunal found in accordance…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by31 opinions
- Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Department of Revenue v. Exxon Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Milwaukee Transformer Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Weaver v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.