Legal Opinion

Armour v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 9, 1952No. C. D. 1482PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EKwall, Judge:

This case involves an importation of canned meats from Argentina on September 22, 1941. The original protest is against the collector’s decision assessing duty on the entire shipment, and it is claimed that a refund should have been authorized under section 563 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and the customs regulations, since there was injury or destruction of said canned meats while within the limits of the port of entry and before having been landed under the supervision of the officers of the customs. In an amendment to the protest, it is claimed, first, that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Barr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. Morris European & American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Penick & Ford Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Suwannee Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. H. Z. Bernstein Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. American Distilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Diamond Match Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  5. Tex Mex Brick & Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API