Suwannee Steamship Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Re, Judge:
Defendant has moved under rule 4.7(b) (2) to dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.
Rule 4.7 (b) (2) of the rules of this court provides:
“(b) Defenses: How Presented: The following defenses may be made by a motion to dismiss: * * * (2) lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter; * * *. A motion making any of these defenses may be made before answer.”
It is noted at the outset that, when read together with rules 4.4 through 4.7, it might appear that the jurisdictional defense pleaded may be raised only on a motion to dismiss the complaint, and not on a…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Farrell Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- American Export Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
- Farrell Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Maple Leaf Fish Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Michelin Tire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.