Legal Opinion

Diamond Match Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 11, 1962No. 5067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

The basic question in this case is whether an additional duty should have been assessed by the collector under section 304(c) of the *53Tariff Act because the imported merchandise was not itself marked with the country of origin. Appellant, an American manufacturer, protested the failure to assess such additional duty.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, C.D. 2154 and C.D. 2223, denying appellee’s motions to dismiss the protest and overruling the protest.

The merchandise was imported from Japan and consists of bundles…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jones v. FarrarOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Penick & Ford Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Armour v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. American Distilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. Mitchell Food Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. Avecia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API