Legal Opinion

Hampton v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 24, 1927No. 2761PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGRaham, Presiding Judge

The Tariff Act of 1922 contains the following duty provision:

12. Barium carbonate, precipitated, 1 cent per pound; barium chloride, 1% cents per pound; barium dioxide, 4 cents per pound; barium hydroxide, 1% cents per pound; and barium nitrate, 2 cents per pound.

That act also contains the following administrative provision:

Sec. 315. (a) That in order to regulate the foreign commerce of the United States and to put into force and effect the policy of the Congress by this act intended, whenever the President, upon investigation of the differences in costs of production of articles wholly or in…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Armour v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Albert F. Maurer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. H. Z. Bernstein Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Best Foods, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  5. T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API