Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Short

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1884No. 11,305PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

The controlling questions are presented by the assignment of error in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. The material facts as shown by the evidence are as follows: In 1877, appellee John Short, and his wife, executed to appellant a mortgage upon five different tracts of land, to secure the payment of a note of $1,700, to become due on the 15th day of October, 1880. The interest not having been paid, the mortgage was foreclosed in March, 1880. It was found that $360 was then due, and that the amount of the note, $1,700, would become due at the time fixed in the note, •viz.:…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. KerlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Nicholson v. CaressIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Conyers v. MericlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Keepfer v. ForceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Easter v. SeverinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Pittsburg Lumber Co. v. ShellTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Stephenson v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  5. Greeley v. DeCottesSupreme Court of Florida · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API