Legal Opinion

Pittsburg Lumber Co. v. Shell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 28 opinions

PROM CARTER. Appeal from the Chancery Conrt of Carter Connty to the Conrt of Civil Appeals, and hy certiorari to the Conrt of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Conrt. —Ms. Shoun, Special Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

The bill in this case was filed for the reformation of a deed executed hy the Pittshnrg Lumber Company to Shell. It was averred that, by mistake, fifty acres were included within the calls of this deed, which land complainant did not intend to convey, nor the defendant to purchase. Incidental relief is sought, which need not be noticed. An answer filed by Shell put in issue the material averments of the bill. Much proof was taken, and there was a decree' for the complainant below, which was affirmed by the court of civil appeals. Shell filed a petition for certiorari, which has been granted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ShortIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Toops v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Wise v. BrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 1892
  4. St. Anthony Falls Water-Power Co. v. MerrimanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Marron v. ScarbroughCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  2. Larue v. Greene County BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Sikora v. VanderploegCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  4. Bituminous Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Izzy Rosen's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  5. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API