Conyers v. Mericles
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Decatur Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Best, C.
The appellee Anthony W. Mericles brought this suit against his co-appellees Nancy Mericles, John A. Maddux, Amos Rodgers, James W. Rodgers, James W. Anderson,William Pruitt and the appellant, for the partition of a tract of land, alleging in his complaint that he owned the three-eighths, his wife Nancy one-fourth, John A. Maddux one-fourth, Amos Rodgers one-eighth, and that James W. Rodgers claimed an interest in the land. He further averred that the appellant had sold the interest of Maddux to him, :and, in conveying it to him, had made him a deed which purported to convey him…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kimble v. ChristieIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Rogers v. AbbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Miller v. KolbIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Angle v. SpeerIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Bell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Curtis v. GoodingIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Ethridge v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Pennsylvania Co. v. PoorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Rossiter v. MerrimanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Wilson v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.