Legal Opinion

Conyers v. Mericles

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8072PublishedCited by 28 opinions

From the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

The appellee Anthony W. Mericles brought this suit against his co-appellees Nancy Mericles, John A. Maddux, Amos Rodgers, James W. Rodgers, James W. Anderson,William Pruitt and the appellant, for the partition of a tract of land, alleging in his complaint that he owned the three-eighths, his wife Nancy one-fourth, John A. Maddux one-fourth, Amos Rodgers one-eighth, and that James W. Rodgers claimed an interest in the land. He further averred that the appellant had sold the interest of Maddux to him, :and, in conveying it to him, had made him a deed which purported to convey him…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kimble v. ChristieIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Rogers v. AbbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Miller v. KolbIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Angle v. SpeerIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Bell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Curtis v. GoodingIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Ethridge v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. PoorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Rossiter v. MerrimanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Wilson v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API