Church at Seattle v. Hendrix
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J. —
Two groups have been striving for the control of a small nondenominational church and its property since the death of its founder and first pastor. No good purpose would be served by detailing their differences, and we shall refer to the groups simply as appellants and respondents.
There is no dispute as to the applicable law. It is conceded that the general rule of law applicable to a church, congregational and nondenominational in its organization, is that the majority controls the policies and its *303property. Elston v. Wilborn, 208 Ark. 377, 186 S.W.2d 662, 158 A.L.R. 179 (1945).
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elston v. WilbornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Dimoff v. Ernie Majer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Hendryx v. People's United ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Clausing v. KassnerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Loehr v. ManningWashington Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Church of Christ at Centerville v. CarderWashington Supreme Court · 1986