Legal Opinion
United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. Mathey
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 6, 1941No. 3622PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAHONEY, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the defendant from an interlocutory decree of the District Court holding valid and infringed claims 2, 4 and 16 of patent No. 1,807,996, applied for May 27, 1929, and issued to the plaintiff June 2, 1931, and ordering an injunction and accounting with costs. The lower court held that claim 40 was invalid, and the plaintiff did not appeal from that portion of the decision. Subsequent to the entry of judgment, the plaintiff filed. a disclaimer as to claim 40, and it is no longer a part of the patent.
The alleged infringing machine-is made in two…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. GreenleafSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lanyon v. M. H. Detrick Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Metal Cutting Tool Service v. National Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mathey v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Urquhart v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases). Urquhart v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Lorenz v. General Steel Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Mathey v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1944
- MPT, Inc. v. Marathon Labels, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.