Legal Opinion
Lanyon v. M. H. Detrick Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1936No. 7941PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
Appellee brought suit to obtain an injunction restraining appellant from making, using, or selling any furnace construction embodying the inventions disclosed in the Beall and Foltz patents, both of which are owned by appellee. Appellant asks review of the decree which granted the relief sought by appellee. The patents involved relate to furnace construction.
Witness Nathan E. Lewis, a mechanical engineer, testified on behalf of appellee, and related a part of the history and problems connected with the present day furnaces. It appears that between the years 1910 and 1915…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Himes v. ChadwickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Reeves Brothers, Inc. v. US Laminating Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Oregon Saw Chain Corporation, a Corporation v. McCulloch Motors Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Schnitzer v. California Corrugated Culvert Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.